The world faces more and more data breaches caused by lost or stolen credentials. How to manage network user accounts in order to protect corporate data?
Many companies do not track how their employees use shared privileged credentials and do not engage in privileged user monitoring. Instead, these organizations set tough frames for personal accountability within their facilities. According to a study by Gartner, improper privileged access management will be the major cause of about 60% of data breach incidents by 2018 compared to 40% in 2015.
To access a user directory service account with administrator privileges, hackers may apply spear phishing, the Pass the hash method, or other methods.
In an organization, there are different types of privileged accounts, categorized by the task they perform:
Companies should be aware of possible outsider and insider attacks on these accounts and strive to improve control measures for users with privileged access permissions. In this article, we will cover the best practices of the privileged access management(PAM).
To ensure accountability for all privileged accounts in your organization, you should inventory them, especially if you used dynamic environments. To accurately list such accounts, you may use the autodiscovery feature provided by various PAM solutions. Furthermore, your list should contain detailed information about owners of privileged accounts and their roles. This technique will allow you to monitor who is responsible for a particular account and prevent an unauthorized access for employees that no longer work in your company.
While this practice seems to be quite obvious, some administrators insist that sharing shared-account passwords among approved users can’t lead to negative consequences. However, this approach makes proper personal accountability impossible and violates regulatory compliance requirements. Furthermore, it increases a probability of revealing these passwords to others. Therefore, you should ensure that shared-account passwords are accessible only to account owners. To avoid revealing shared-account passwords, you should consider implementing the single sign-on (SSO) authentication. In case you need to reveal a password, you have to change it after use.
To reduce risks of data thefts, you should minimize the number of account with a privileged access or even eliminate all accounts with permanent and full privileges if possible. The same practice is applicable when it comes to shared privileged accounts that are hard to account for. It is impossible to define a concise appropriate number of accounts with privileged access, but they should be as few as possible in case you want to get a better control them.
To better protect your data from disclosure and ensure the proper superuser privilege management, you should set minimum rights needed for specific users so as they could perform their obligations. Establish a well-controlled use of privileged accounts. Every such account should have minimum privileges that are necessary to accomplish specific tasks. It means that if a specific account is assigned for application administration, then it shouldn’t have system permissions beyond the scope of configuring or restarting said app. Therefore, you shouldn’t enable this account on those systems that have doesn’t have the app in question running.
To reduce risks of compromising privileged accounts, you should manage passwords wisely. They should be complex, unique, regularly changed, and never shared. It will ensure a better protection for sensitive data and keep out ordinary user accounts from the ones with privileged access. Make sure these passwords are individual to all privileged users and unique for each account or app. Furthermore, never store passwords unencrypted so that no one can compromise them.
You should split up privileges necessary to accomplish specific tasks among various administrators. It will allow you to ensure that those admins won’t have conflicting privileges. Since superuser administrative privileges provide users with full access to data and operations, divided privileges will reduce a risk if users with privileged access ever to perform malicious actions.
Administrators usually utilize personal accounts without privileged permissions to accomplish their ordinary tasks, such as surfing the Internet, working with their emails, using corporate applications, etc. Instead of granting administrators with a full access, use privileged elevation to allow them to perform corresponding actions when needed. Such temporary privileged access will significantly reduce data theft threats.
The advantage of a one-time password (OTP) over a static one is that the password can not be reused. Thus, an attacker who intercepts data from a successful authentication session can’t use the copied password to get access to the protected information system. However, using OTPs, you can’t protect your system from attacks based on an active interference in the communication channel used for authentication, e.g. “man in the middle” attacks. Although, it will increase security within user authentication.
The double-layered protection will ensure secure authentication and make it more difficult for third parties to intercept your data. Unlike a traditional logging process only with a username or password (knowledge factors), two-factor authentication also includes possession factors (physical tokens, SMS, biometrics, etc.) to let users access to an account. Two-factor authentication forms an additional barrier for hackers striving to get administrative privileges in order to access corporate applications and data. Without physical access to person’s phone or security token, hackers will be unable to authenticate.
In fact, proper privileged access management is not enough for ensuring a high security level for your corporate systems. To timely detect suspicious activities and efficiently investigate malicious operations, you should record privileged user sessions. By reviewing these sessions, you will be able to see all performed actions within their proper context, allowing you to determine whether malicious activity have taken place. User activity monitoring solutions also usually contain robust alerting functionality, allowing you to not only investigate issues after the fact, but also detect incidents as they happen and often even block ongoing sessions, preventing further damage.
Ekran System is a universal insider threat detection tool that enables companies to audit activities of both regular and privileged users and protect corporate systems from data breaches. The solution can record, monitor, and audit privileged sessions as well as provides an intuitive user interface with effective search tools.
Real-time alerts will allow you to timely detect suspicious activity and block it if the session is still ongoing. Using Ekran System, you will be able to control access to monitored endpoints due to the built-in two-factor authentication feature and one-time password functionality. Furthermore, with this solution, you can depersonalize corporate shared accounts by enabling a requirement to provide personal account credentials while using shared access. Thus, you will always know who stands behind a specific shared account session.
Ekran System allows monitoring privileged user sessions while enabling you to focus on your priority security tasks and implementing other best practices for privileged access management.
At press time, bitcoin has fallen back a bit and is now trading for just over $6,300. This is about…
When the banks failed in 2008, our financial systems shifted. A decade on, one of our most nagging financial predicaments…
Crypto markets are down across the board, and that’s nothing new. But what’s behind Ethereum losing 44 percent of its…
Ripple is targeting the Chinese market with its blockchain products, a top executive has revealed. The company has been partnering…
Coinbase has announced the acquisition of Distributed Systems, a decentralized identity solutions provider. In a blog post announcing the acquisition,…