Categories: NewsTechnology

Are Social Platforms Responsible for User-Generated Content?

Allegations of the Trump Administration colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election have flared up again. While that’s intriguing in its own right, it’s far more interesting to take a look at how some social media and other online businesses are behaving in the wake of this news. Facebook, for example, seems to be on the defensive.

Being an online media outlet can be rough

Facebook and other online outlets have become very defensive in the wake of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 election. The company has good reason to do so, since it’s been suggested Facebook may have acted as a vehicle for Russian propaganda influencing the votes of its users. Whether or not such allegations are substantiated remains up to investigative and judicial bodies, but they are certainly worth taking seriously.

However, it is not only the Russia story that can put online platforms like Facebook into awkward situations. Literally any misinformation campaign on the part of an institutional or local actor can lead to a scandal for these sorts of websites. Are sites then responsible for misinformation campaigns on their platforms?

Unregulated and unvetted content

One particular area in which misinformation campaigns thrive is advertising. This is probably the most mediated and vetted category of content on social media sites, but it is worth noting that sometimes keeping up with all inbound advertising proposals can be difficult. Things can slip through, and sneaky content can influence.

Another important source is user-generated content. Pages, posts, comments, and so forth can all be incredibly influential. Even small voices can find each other and become loud, chaotic juggernauts of influence. It does not matter if they are correct or factual, as once they’ve started they can be nearly impossible to stop. Social websites are not legally responsible for checking the validity of the claims they publish, but should they?

The problem that we may just have to deal with

I am a big advocate of doing your own research and having your own discussions. If you see something, talk about it, and think it through. Taking something at face value just because someone else said it can be dangerous.

Popular websites currently have the dilemma of whether or not they are responsible for user-generated content. I think that they should focus more attention on vetting their advertisement data and verifying sources of that data, but I do not like a world where all user-generated data needs to be approved. That too quickly lends itself to websites only publishing the ideas they agree with, regardless of fact.

I would rather live in a world where online speech freedoms are not impeded upon, but in one where we all do a better job of being a critical judge of the content we consume.

Dariusz

Dariusz is a Digital Anthropologist who has been closely following the world of cryptocurrencies since 2014. He has been somewhat of a crypto-evangelist, trying to educate more people on the exciting realm of cryptocurrency. During his time at University College London, his Master's dissertation focused on how communities inhabit, modify, and create virtual places via social media.

Recent Posts

Blockchain Academic Research Bolstered by Stanford’s New Blockchain Research Center

Stanford University has launched an initiative that will be dedicated to the research and development of blockchain technology. The Center…

57 mins ago

Incent Loyalty celebrates ‘Bitcoin Pizza’ moment with first real-world transaction

Incent has been used to settle a $1,400 bill with a local restaurant – the token’s very own Bitcoin Pizza…

2 hours ago

Bitcoin Price Watch: Is the Recent Drop Part of a Bigger Picture?

At press time, bitcoin is retaining its $6,100 price from yesterday. The currency fell to this position from $6,700 after…

18 hours ago

Are Centralized Exchanges Breaking the Crypto Promise?

Exchange hacks are becoming the new normal. Just two weeks after Conrail’s $37.2 million hack, it was time for Bithumb’s…

19 hours ago

What Is Forging, and Is It a Viable Alternative to Bitcoin Mining?

As more and more people join the cryptocurrency conversation, Bitcoin mining has been thrust into the limelight. And just like…

20 hours ago

Litecoin Founder Remains Optimistic Despite Recent Bithumb Hack

Charlie Lee, the developer behind the world’s sixth-largest cryptocurrency, Litecoin, believes the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will recover…

21 hours ago