Velvet Capital just had one of the most explosive weeks in DeFi, with its native token climbing from $0.09 to $0.90 in a matter of days.
But while retail traders were chasing the ten-times move, on-chain analysts were watching something else entirely, team-linked wallets quietly routing nearly $20 million worth of VELVET to exchanges as the price was still climbing.
The timing has raised serious questions, and the market is paying attention.
Source : CoinMarketCap
Contents
The 10x Surge That Put Velvet Capital on the Radar
The move was hard to ignore. VELVET went from $0.09 to $0.90 in just a few days, a ten-times return in a compressed window that generated significant attention across Crypto Twitter and drew fresh eyes to a project that had been operating largely under the radar. For context, Velvet Capital positions itself as an institutional-grade DeFi operating system built to streamline on-chain portfolio management and tokenised asset creation. It is not a meme coin or a purely speculative token, it has real backers and a stated infrastructure thesis.
Why are you still using 5 different apps?
One for crypto
One for stocks
One for commodities
One for research
One for executionMeanwhile the best opportunities move across ALL markets
Today, that changes
Global markets are live on Velvet with our @tradexyz integration pic.twitter.com/wREqMTJIpZ
— Velvet | Onchain Terminal (@Velvet_Capital) June 2, 2026
The main catalyst behind the surge was Velvet Capital’s integration with Trade XYZ, which allows users to trade global markets, stocks, commodities, and pre-IPO shares including SpaceX and OpenAI, with leverage directly inside Velvet’s on-chain terminal. That is a genuinely compelling product narrative in the current market environment, where the appetite for tokenised real-world assets and pre-IPO exposure has been building for months. The integration gave the market a concrete reason to buy, and buy it did.
Team-linked Wallets Move $19.8 Million to Exchanges During The Pump
Here is where the story gets complicated. On-chain analyst EmberCN flagged the wallet activity, that had been building throughout the price surge.
Over the past three days, precisely the window during which VELVET was climbing most aggressively, addresses linked to the project team transferred 22 million VELVET tokens worth approximately $19.8 million to exchanges including Bitget, Gate, and KuCoin.
又是一场 "激烈的" 现货操纵+合约收割 ？
1⃣DEX 平台 @Velvet_Capital 最近几天里拉升了 10 倍 (从 $0.09→$0.9)。
而在这爆涨期间，项目方关联地址最近 3 天里向 Bitget、Gate、Kucoin 等交易所转移了 2200 万枚 velvet:native ($1980 万)。
地址：https://t.co/Mnrta7pEmG2⃣另外，VELVET… pic.twitter.com/IcBpYksUi9
— 余烬 (@EmberCN) June 11, 2026
The destination matters. Transferring tokens to centralized exchanges is not the same as selling them, but it is the step that immediately precedes selling.
When team-linked addresses move $19.8 million worth of a token to exchange deposit addresses while that token is in the middle of a ten-times price run, the most straightforward interpretation is that someone with early, cheap access to those tokens is preparing to, or already is, converting them into other assets at elevated prices.
That interpretation has a name in crypto: exit liquidity. Whether it applies here is a judgment call, but the on-chain data makes the question unavoidable.
DWF Labs Adds Another $6 Million to the Exchange Flow
The team wallets are not the only ones moving. VELVET’s market maker, DWF Labs, transferred 6.68 million VELVET tokens worth approximately $6 million to the same set of exchanges over the past month.
DWF Labs is one of the most active market makers in crypto and is not shy about its involvement with projects, it regularly takes positions in tokens it supports. But market maker transfers to exchanges during a significant price appreciation event carry their own set of interpretations, and combining them with the team wallet activity creates a picture that the community is understandably scrutinising.
In total, between team-linked wallets and DWF Labs, over $25 million worth of VELVET has moved toward exchange sell infrastructure during a period when the token was appreciating rapidly. That is a structural supply overhang sitting above the market that retail buyers who chased the ten-times move may not have been fully aware of when they entered.
The Cap Table Explains the Structural Bid
Understanding who holds VELVET helps explain both why the token could move so fast and why the exchange transfers carry the weight they do. Velvet Capital is heavily backed by YZI Labs, the entity formerly known as Binance Labs and Gate Labs. That investor pedigree explains the structural demand that can accelerate a move like this: when a token with Binance Labs lineage generates a live product catalyst, the institutional awareness and exchange relationship advantages that come with that backing can create rapid price discovery.
But the same concentration that powers a move to the upside creates real risk on the way down. When the largest holders and the project team are sending tokens to exchanges during a ten-times run, the question of who is left buying at $0.90 becomes the central one for anyone still holding or considering entry.
Spot Manipulation, Futures Harvesting, or a Legitimate Breakout?
The pattern here fits what on-chain analysts describe as coordinated spot manipulation combined with futures harvesting, a strategy where large holders drive spot price appreciation through structured buying, generate elevated open interest in derivatives markets as retail follows the move, and then distribute tokens into the exchange-driven sell infrastructure they have been quietly building during the run.
Whether that is what happened with VELVET or whether this is a genuine breakout on the back of a compelling product integration is exactly the question the market is wrestling with right now. The Trade XYZ integration is real and the use case for leveraged on-chain access to SpaceX and OpenAI pre-IPO shares is genuinely interesting.
But $19.8 million in team-linked exchange deposits and $6 million from the market maker during the same three-day window as a ten-times price move is not something that can be dismissed as coincidence. The on-chain data is there. What retail does with that information is, as always, entirely up to them.
Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.
Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!
